Tracking the World Vision / NFL Shirt Donation Controversy
Posted on February 12, 2011 at 8:53 pm
There are now over 60 posts on the controversial NFL t-shirt donation to World Vision. This blog will be regularly updated as new posts are written. Recent posts are added to the top of each section.
Posts on the controversy:
#70 World Vision Super Bowl Shirts: The final chapter - Aid Watch - A must read, analyzes World Vision documentation for evidence supporting World Vision’s claims.
#69 Would you hire me if I disagreed with you? What if I did it publicly? – Find What Works – Extends the conversation started in the post #12 Explaining the radio silence over World Vision – and asks the question what are the risks of blogging for aid professionals.
#68 How much are the NFL shirts worth? World Vision isn’t saying – Good Intentions are Not Enough – In response to World Vision’s recent post discussing fair market value.
#67 When is it a bad idea to give the poor free stuff? – Boston University’s Economics Club – Discusses the impact donated goods have on the local economy and production capacities.
#66 World Vision: What are you seeing? – morgan ash – A cross post of PDT’s post # 38
#65 worldvision and the 100kshirts – The Theology of Joe - Compares the cost of producing shirts in bulk locally versus shipping them in.
#64 The World Vision controversy continues – Good Intentions are Not Enough – Questions information shared in World Visions recent responses to the controversy.
#63 A Look at World Vision’s Responses Pt.1 – Wanderings - Questions some of World Vision’s responses in their two most recent posts.
#62 Middle East erupts, foreign aid cuts and World Vision survives Superbowl T-shirt attack – Humanosphere – Good synopsis of the controversy thus far.
#61 The NFL’s T-shirt Donation to World Vision: Charity or Closet Cleaning – Huffington Post – a version of #60 by the same author.
#60 GODSTUFF: Stuff we don’t want, stuff they don’t need? – The Dude Abides – A religion columnist provides an overview of the debate and an interview with World Vision on the topic.
#59 Tainted Gifts in Kind? – UN Dispatch – Talks about why GIK programs are so common and how hard they are to do well.
#58 Hyundai’s ‘One Million Dream Balls’ could be a Nightmare for Africa - Alive and Kicking – Asks why we aren’t focusing on equally bad GIK programs such as the soccer ball donation.
#57 Richard Walden’s comment on post Don’t Choose a Charity Based on Administration Rates – Explains the history of how the admin ratio came to be used – and it has nothing to do with quality or effectiveness of the program.
#56 Mystical Experiences about Ancestors and T-shirts - Hand Relief International (satire)
#55 Women Friendly Condoms that Help Africa – The Kathmandu Diet – Compares World Vision and TOMS shoes approach to gifts-in-kind to that of a product that is often not made locally.
CBC radio interview with Dean Karlan regarding the controversy.
#54 Pop Tarts and T-Shirts To The Rescue – Kara Stewart - Compares the NFL shirt donation to an aid delivery the author was part of in Albania, which included expired Pop Tarts, dented paint cans, and bath items containing placenta.
World Vision responds to blogger questions – posted on Aid Watch
#53 Attacking the Aid Industry Mafia – Tales of Corruption, Deceit, and Lies – One Girl Blog – Discusses the silence around aid industry mistakes and asks how to break through that.
#52 A Gift in Kind – mcollinknight – A summary of the controversy.
#51 Don’t Choose a Charity Based on Administration Rates – Huffington Post – A modified version of #20
#50 why t-shirts are bad aid: the research – Texas in Africa – Provides an overview of the findings of research on donated goods.
#49 “Super” gifts in kind draw criticism to World Vision – Poverty News Blog – A recap of some of the criticisms leveled against World Vision.
#48 Awaiting World Vision’s Reply – Good Intentions are Not Enough – Discusses how this is about more than just t-shirts, but about professional standards and where the aid industry goes from here.
#47 why I am no longer supporting worldvision – The Theology of Joe - Talks about his decision to no longer donate to World Vision due to their gifts-in-kind practices.
#46 The elephant is still in the room – Wait… What?! - Points out how little has changed since she wrote “The elephant in the room” during the 1millionshirts debate.
#45 How to get World Vision to stop sending gifts-in-kind to developing countries – Project Diaspora - Talks about how to better use social media to get more attention drawn to the controversy.
#44 1,250 reasons to love the NFL – whydev - A satirical post that also looks at the recent lack of seats for people with seats to the Super Bowl.
#43 #100kShirts: an open letter to world vision usa – Kylevermeulen – A current donor and former employee asks World Vision to reconsider the gifts-in-kind portfolio.
#42 Changes Needed - Tales from the Hood - Talks about the need to change the AERDO standards for gifts-in-kind, remove the “overhead” ratio from conversation, and improve professionalism in the field.
#41 The Steelers won the Super Bowl? T-shirts sent to Africa say so. – Christian Science Monitor – Same as post #21 but to a larger audience.
#40 What Happens to All Those Super Bowl T-Shirts?: A Guest Post by Dean Karlan - NYT Freakonomics blog
#39 Does it take faith to give a shirt? – Wanderings – Delves into the religious aspect of aid and the shirt donations.
#38 World Vision: What are you seeing? – Peace Dividend Trust – Discusses how donated goods focus more on the needs of the donors than the recipients.
#37 Of t-shirts and men – Short Sentences – Criticizes both the t-shirt donation and other aid interventions. Pushes for changes in farm subsidies, tariffs and other trade restrictions.
#36 Losing our shirts at smartaid – KM on a dollar a day – Asks if the power of social media can actually change the actions of of a major aid organization.
#35 World Vision Not at Fault – Travis Warrington – talks about the difference between aid and development, needs and wants.
#34 a question World Vision needs to answer – Texas in Africa
#33 Stop Sending your Crap to Haiti and Africa – inHerEyePhotography – Talks about the uselessness of donated t-shirts and reposts a post written about shoe donations.
#32 El problema de donar camisetas (playeras): World Vision USA y el Super Bowl - Blog del curso “Antropología Social y Cultural”, carrera de Trabajo Social, Universidad Nacional de San Juan (San Juan, Argentina) – Presentación de la discusión e introducción al debate en Español.
#31 I’d Give You the Shirt Off of my Back – Wanderings - Looks at all aspects of the debate as well as the religious aspects.
#30 Big fish in big barrels – Aid Thoughts – In a pirate’s voice questions whether going after World Vision in the public arena is best idea or whether there is another approach.
#29 Stupid T-Shirts for Poor Widdle Romania - I’m More Romanian Than You! - Someone in Romania not happy about the project. Also links to the video of T-shirt Travels.
#28 Steelers and World Vision Beat Zambia in Super Bowl – The Blog of Diminishing Returns – A quick rundown of the controversy.
#27 Where’s the Baby - Tales from the Hood - Explains 1 MORE TIME the pressures behind and problems with gifts-in-kind.
#26 In Zambia, Pittsburgh won the Super Bowl: Why is World Vision perpetuating discredited T-shirt aid? – Aid Watch – Summary of the controversy and asks if the people-power will be able to impact World Vision’s policies.
#25 The other problem with t-shirts: high-profile, cheap GIK perpetuate stereotypes – empty sky – talks about the stereotypes activities like this promote and connects these stereotypes to Oprah’s school in South Africa.
#24 Breaking the Radio Silence – In Event of Moon Disaster – asks why aid bloggers don’t talk about many other topics as well, in particular religious charities.
#23 Aid is more than t-shirts – Stimulation – written by a World Vision staff member
#22 Are World Vision really the bad guys? – Tales from the warm heart of Africa – Asks how you alleviate poverty by handing out free stuff.
#21 On World Vision – Texas in Africa – Great summary of the issues and a challenge to do better.
#20 An example of why percentage spent on administration is meaningless - Good Intentions are Not Enough – Shows how easy it is to manipulate the percentage spent on administration costs.
#19 The big fuss about World Vision GIK – Social Enterprise - A post in favor of the program
#18 WV USA, TShirts and the role of NGOS – Ethnic Supplies
#17 Do Gooders Who Don’t – Development Disasters – One bloggers experience with donated goods.
#16 Barbarian Economics and World Vision’s NFL Shirt Donation - Guest post by Bill Westerly – humorously lays out how to find the exact value of the shirts.
#15 Not with the shirts again, stop it already! Project Diaspora – Compares World Vision to 1 million shirts
#14 Prove me wrong: why World Vision should change, but won’t – Brett Keller - Looks at whether this program is the best use of World Vision’s time and money.
#13 World Vision Politik – A View from the Cave – Discusses how World Vision’s response to the controversy does not answer key questions or satisfy critics.
#12 Explaining the radio silence over World Vision - Good Intentions are Not Enough – discusses industry pressure and fear of being fired that is keeping people silent on this issue.
#11 What Communities Want - Water Wellness - Talking to a Malawi World Vision staff on what’s really needed – and it’s not t-shirts
#10 Anti Accountability: World Vision Pressures Agencies Not To Criticize Their Irresponsible Giving- GlassFrog - A call for greater transparency from World Vision
#9 Oh, You People and Your Damn T-Shirt Donations - Shotgun Shack – Discusses how this program is just one more example of the massive gap between fundraisers and field staff.
#8 Watch Out World (Vision) - Stratosphere – Talks about the criteria she teaches students to use when thinking about development program and asking if World Vision could answer those same questions.
#7 World Vision USA and those 100,000 Tshirt – Birds on the Birds Blog – A frustrated rant about the project and the ethics of the aid world.
#6 Super Bowl Sadness - Fermanian Business & Economic Institute blog – urges World Vision to consider other ways to handle the NFL shirt program.
#5 T-shirts and doing good – Away & Home – thoughts on the message this and similar project sends to donors and the importance of donor education.
#4 Dear Jas – er – I mean – World Vision – Wanderlust – an open letter to World Vision
#3 100K Discussions about World Vision - A View from the Cave – poses a series of questions about the shirt donation program and welcomes debate.
#2 World Vision under fire for NFL “loser” clothing donations – Humanosphere – introduces the controversy to their readers.
#1 World Vision, the next 100,000 shirts - Good Intentions are Not Enough – Discusses the financial motivations behind gifts-in-kind donations.
Posts from World Vision:
GIK and development programming
The financial costs and benefits of sending a shirt overseas
Basic overview of World Vision’s strategy and structure and our U.S. GIK operations
World Vision responds to blogger questions – posted on Aid Watch
100,000 reasons to love the Super Bowl
Posts related to the donation program in general:
Steelers vs. Packers: Whose Super Bowl XLV merch is going abroad? – Supply Chain – talks about the cost of shipping the shirts.
Kids in Haiti Who Think the Steelers Won the Super Bowl: An Economic Perspective - Minyanville - a sports fan tries to buy last year’s shirt.
NFL lies to Africa, Latin America - Place it on Lucky Dan
—–
Guides by Good Intentions are Not Enough
Good Intentions’ Guide to Holiday Charitable Giving
—–
« Barbarian Economics and World Vision’s NFL Shirt Donations • An example of why the percent spent on administration is meaningless »
[...] – but then there is the whole debate around those NFL t-shirts… LikeBe the first to like this [...]
[...] Tracking the World Vision / NFL Shirt Donation Controversy [...]
Question for the masses: can someone link to a scientific study about how GIK depress and/or wipe out local textile markets? I’m not doubting the studies are out there – I’ve simply failed to find one thus far that would fit for this situation, especially considering what World Vision said yesterday about distributing 100,000 shirts to a number of villages in 30+ countries. Thanks in advance.
AppleSeed,
You of course mean the $241 million dollars of gifts-in-kind that World Vision distributes each year along with the millions of dollars in goods from hundreds of other organizations doing the exact same thing. It’s the cumulative impact that’s the real problem, not this individual program. And World Vision is a high profile nonprofit that sets an example to all the other aid organizations and individuals. Their advertising creates the impression that this is the right thing to do.
Bret Keller makes the great observation that everything the World Vision does is about minimizing harm rather than maximizing impact.
“Amy at World Vision is right that their response will likely dispel some criticism, but not all. But that’s not because we critics are a particularly cantankerous bunch — we just think they could be doing better. Her response shows that, at least in one sense, they are a lot better than Jason of the 1 Million Shirts fiasco, if they’re spreading the shirts out and doing local research on needs — but those things are more about minimizing potential harm than they are maximizing impact. In short, World Vision’s defense seems to be “hey, what we’re doing isn’t that bad” when really they should be saying “you know what? there are lots of things we could be doing instead of this that would be much greater impact.” So in another way World Vision is much worse than Jason, because they have enough experts on these things to know what they’re doing and that this sort of program has very little likelihood of pulling anyone out of poverty, they know there are better things they could be doing with the same money, and they still do it.”
@AppleSeed, the most important reference is Frazier’s study “Used-Clothing and Apparel Production in Africa” (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02190.x/abstract – gated). You might also check out Rivoli’s study, The Travels of a T-Shirt in the Global Economy (http://www.amazon.com/Travels-T-Shirt-Global-Economy-Economist/dp/0471648493), Slesnik’s 1996 article “Consumption and Poverty: How Effective are In-Kind Transfers?” (http://www.jstor.org/pss/2235199), and
@loomnie also wrote a dissertation on secondhand clothing in Nigeria; I’m sure he would have some good suggestions. Here’s another paper with lots of references: http://www.philau.edu/schools/liberalarts/news/documents/SlotterbackSET.pdf
For anyone wanting a summary of this research see this post on Texas in Africa “why t-shirts are bad aid: the research“
[...] Este es el nombre del blog de Saundra Schimmelpfennig (@saundra_s), quien está recopilando los distintos blogs que se han sumado a esta polémica. Por otro lado, Saundra ha presentado una de los posiciones más [...]
[...] unwanted superbowl shirts that were printed with the logo of the losing team. The blogosphere responded – but with much less speed and gusto than with Jason. This time things are a little more [...]
I actually think this is worse than the #1millionshirts saga, largely because in taking the shirts, WV is helping the stupid sports clothing market operate. They’re giving moral credibility to the idea that ‘well, yes, we’re throwing away 50% of the shirts, but they’re going to kids in Africa. So that’s ok then’. And then when someone challenges them, as you point out, their reaction is ‘hey, we’re better than Jason, we KNOW where the needs are..’
Yes, they’re new unworn t-shirts. But they’re entirely redundant shirts which should never have been made in the first place, WV are just enabling the brands to get out of a moral hole.
[...] 15, 2011 PDT is throwing its hat into the ring on the World Vision NFL T-Shirt debate. @good_intents(via @saundra_s) has an aggregated listing, thanks [...]
[...] been thinking more on this World Vision issue as the debate rages on (with recent, noticeable silence from World Vision), especially from a ‘faith-based’ [...]
[...] are many angles to this debate and you can read all about it with this collection of posts from the interwebs. Unlike with Jason, the responses have been a lot slower coming in, [...]
Thank you all for responding to my post (and for being helpful). Very interesting – and convincing – reading in those papers. Now, another question. I’d greatly appreciate insight on this too.
The NFL has produced 100,000 shirts. Since you don’t want them donated/given to Africa, what should happen to them? Throw them away? Cut them up?
Here’s the thing: the NFL and others have made this a practice. It happened after the BCS National Championship too. Retailers want the product *immediately* because fans want the product *immediately.* So my question, again: where should these 100,000 shirts go?
Appleseed,
Our over production and self-serving business practices are not the developing world’s problem. They should not have to have their markets flooded with these free goods so that the NFL gets a pass on their business practices. They could very easily distribute them locally – except of course that they don’t allow them to see the light of day in the US because they don’t want their brand hurt.
The aid world does not need to be the vehicle to facilitate US businesses doing whatever meets their own needs.
Saundra, with all due respect, I disagree. You can’t distribute these locally (which is the problem). These are misprinted t-shirts that probably say “Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl Champions!” No one wants that.
Therein lies my question: what should happen to these misprinted t-shirts? Should we shred them and throw them away?
What, you couldn’t donate them to the poor people here? Why are these unwanted shirts good enough for “them” but not good enough for “us”? Anyway, in the end it’s NFL’s fault for purposefully printing 100,000 shirts they knew no one would want. Our garbage is not the solution to someone else’s problem.
No, you really can’t. If you’d like to make it an “us” versus “them” debate, the answer is that they have little value to “us” because the Steelers did not win the Super Bowl. I suppose we could use them as dishrags.
I see where you are coming from, I really do. Let’s change the NFL! Absolutely! But here’s another thought. Where do you think these t-shirts are made? I’ll give you a hint: it’s not America. In fact, El Salvador is one of the popular hot spots for manufacturing NFL goods. So if you’d like to eliminate this practice, congratulations, you also just lost thousands of dollars in business that would have gone to a poor country also. Now we could talk about the sweatshop conditions there too…but that’s another story for another blog.
Yes, the problem is the NFL. But as long as consumers are demanding goods the moment after their team wins the Super Bowl, you can sure as heck know that somehow those goods will be delivered.
Would also need to talk about the environmental impact etc….
Much of the gifts-in-kind problem stem from the problem in our society as a whole of over-consumption. We then use the donation of the goods as a way to justify our consumption and disposing life style.
I say, let’s discard them all. I know it goes against the whole mentality of “Waste not, want not” and “Surely someone wants/can use this junk” but, hear me out. Instead of putting out a press release trumpeting bad aid in the form of accepting GiK from the NFL, World Vision promotes the wasteful destruction of 100,000 shirts to highlight the consumptive patterns of America – bringing attention and awareness to practices that only benefit the wealthy. Instead of propping up consumption, World Vision could challenge why there is the need for instant merchandise which, subsequently, causes the NFL to purposefully print extra shirts. Now THIS might be a more useful response in the fight for social justice and poverty elimination.
[...] You’d have to have been asleep or hungover for most of the past week to have missed the growing aid blogosphere kerfuffle over the World Vision USA / NFL #100kshirts controversy. I won’t bother to recount the history. But if this is the first you’re hearing about it, Saundra has a good summary of what’s going on here. [...]
I haven’t read all of the posts yest, but I haven’t come across much that debates how unsustainable it is in the first place to produce 100,000 T-Shirts that are essentially going to waste. I know we live in weird just-in-time etc times, but maybe next time the NFL waits until they have a winner, then prints only one set of T-Shirts and then sits down with a charity to discuss how the equivalent of the un-produced ‘loser’ T-Shirts can be invested in Africa…
[...] overall vision and mission. Several aid workers have called them out on this; you can see the list of posts here. Talesfromthehood has given some recommendations on what would need to happen to move things [...]
[...] response at that time did little to address the concerns and questions of their critics. In fact, 33 posts have been written by bloggers since World Vision’s [...]
[...] the news emerges that the massive NGO Worldvision would be taking the excess to distribute. Cue aid blogger outrage last seen with the #1millionshirt saga. Then WV respond that not only are they proud of their [...]
[...] World Vision did reply to some questions asked them over at the Aid Watch blog. I won’t be around the internet today (Thursday) so I won’t be commenting on it, approving comments on the blog, or updating the running list of blog posts. [...]
[...] as the anti-poverty and aid community grew increasingly outraged about this program, launching a petition against World Vision’s practices and demanding the [...]
[...] PS: You can track all the contributions to the discussion here. [...]
[...] comment (here) on my blog not long ago, plus the whole #100kshirts / invigorated GIK discussion (too many places to link individually) helped it gel for me. I’ve written about elements of it before (here, here…) – it’s [...]