6 questions you should ask before donating goods overseas

Posted on January 16, 2010 at 8:40 am

This is an edited and updated repost of an article originally written in May of 2009

—–
Sending donated goods oversees is an appealing idea because it makes you feel like you’re really helping while at the same time recycling things that are no longer of any use to you. Unfortunately inappropriate donations can do more harm than good and it often costs more to ship used goods than to buy new goods locally. The following are six questions you should always ask before donating.

  1. Is the donation appropriate for the local climate, culture, and religion?
  2. After a disaster, will an influx of donated goods clog the ports?
  3. Do they actually need the donation?
  4. Are the goods available locally?
  5. Will the people receiving the goods be able to afford to fix or replace the donated item?
  6. Will donating this item do more harm than good?

Is the donated item appropriate for the climate, culture, religion of those you are trying to help?

Far too many examples of inappropriate donations came from the tsunami. Winter hat, coats, and gloves to southern Thailand. Canned pork and skimpy clothing donated to Muslim communities. At a conference a military presenter discussed the shipment of dog food they received intended to feed children (I understood it to be actual dog food, some people have questioned whether it was like this donation from New Zealand). None of these donations were actually used and some of them were offensive as well.

Will an influx of donated items clog the ports?

All people and goods arriving in a country must enter through sea or air ports. The influx of people and goods entering a country after a disaster may far exceed the capacity of the local government or the damaged ports and infrastructure to process and transport. This may lead to a bottleneck of goods waiting to be processed and distributed. Unless the country has the staff and capacity to unload, sort, clear, and move goods out of the port, well-intended donations of clothing and other supplies may clog the ports preventing shipments of critical relief supplies from getting through.

Do they actually need it?

A church group once invited me to help them with a care package they were sending to the needy in Thailand. I declined when I saw what they were sending; cloth diapers and diaper pins, and baby bottles. Rural Thai’s didn’t use diapers or bottles back then.

Thai’s dressed babies in a shirt but left them bottomless. This meant that I had a general policy of never picking up a baby. I was also roundly teased on more than one occasion because, as everyone knows, “Baby urine is clean”. Although occasionally unpleasant, there are advantages to this method. Children are potty trained at an extremely young age and don’t suffer from diaper rash.

Bottle were also rarely used, and only by those that are well-off or married to a foreigner. Everyone else breastfed, even working women. My neighbor baby sat for a nurse who worked at the hospital a block or two up the road. The nurse came to the house several times a day to breastfeed her baby.  Bottle feeding would require either a breast pump and refrigeration or baby formula. If they could afford either of those options they would be wealthy enough not to need donated bottles.

Are the goods available locally? – if donating overseas.

Even after disasters it may be possible to purchase goods from the areas surrounding the disaster site that were not destroyed. Purchasing goods from those areas ensures that the goods are appropriate to the local climate and culture. It also supports livelihoods which are critical for rebuilding after a disaster.

After the tsunami, a group of students shipped donated school supplies to Thailand. The person picking them up paid more in clearing customs and shipping them to the affected area than he would have if he’d bought them from the local marketplace. Purchasing goods locally puts money into the economy. No only does the person selling it to you make a little profit, but they will likely order more increasing sales at the factory as well.

Will the people receiving the goods be able to afford to fix or replace the donated item?

Imagine if Russia donated cars to your state to help during the financial crisis. You might be thrilled to receive a free car (although the US car manufactures and dealerships will not be thrilled that their market was undercut) until the first time you had to repair it. The owners manual printed in Russian won’t be too helpful, and it will be difficult to find a mechanic or spare parts for the vehicle.

Items like imported pipes may not work with local systems because of differences in threads or diameters based on inches, not centimeters. If the pipes are broken they cannot be replaced, nor can the system be expanded. If you decide to donate bottles and formula, can the women afford to buy more when the donation runs out?

Will giving this item do more harm than good?

Unfortunately we often know so little about the effects of our donations that you may not be able to answer this question.

After the tsunami, due to media hype and a desire to help, thousands of people donated clothing. So many clothes were donated to India that truckloads of them were just dumped alongside the road. They became a choking hazard for the local cattle and government staff had to be diverted from the recovery effort to dispose of the donations. After disasters baby formula mixed with contaminated water can lead to severe diarrhea and potentially death due to dehydration.

Consider donating within your own community

Although it is tempting to donate goods to help people overseas, it is usually cheaper and better to just send money. Instead of sending over your bras and flip flops, hold a community garage sale and donate the proceeds, or contact a local aid agency and see how you can best help out within your own community.

—–

Related posts:

Good donorship and some early lessons from the earthquake response in Haiti

The worst in-kind donations

Four reasons to NOT donate baby formula overseas

Donating medicine after a disaster

Well intentioned efforts to help after a disaster may make a confusing situation worse

—–

From other blogs:

What IS it with the SHOES? – From Tales from the Hood who is on the ground in Haiti

Logistics questions around the Haiti earthquake – A Humourless Lot – discusses the logistical challenges of moving goods after a disaster and the problems caused by unneeded goods

Don’t send baby formula to Darfur – GlobalHealth@Change.org – Informative article from Alanna Shaikh with links to other resources

Global Post wrote Haiti: Help with money, not stuff discussing the problems caused by donated medicine after disasters

The challenge of reverse logistics in global health – A Humourless Lot - looks at the problems that arise when too much is sent or things have to be sent back
—–

Other Resources:

Interaction: How to Help

Center of International Disaster Information (CIDI): Guidelines for appropriate International Disaster Donations

«   •   »

Comments
  • mjfrombuffalo January 18, 2010 at 10:23 am

    I would add to #3, “Do they STILL need the donation?” The email you get today saying that someone needs “X” might be based on news that’s days, weeks, or months old, and it could be that the people who once needed “X” are now drowning in “X.”
    I once made the mistake of not putting an end date on a suitcase drive for foster kids. I received hundreds of suitcases, much more than I could handle and more than the receiving agency could accept. A year later, I was still getting calls from people wanting to give me suitcases. Luckily, Internet access wasn’t universal yet and so my drive didn’t go viral, but I can only imagine the tsunami of suitcases I’d have received if it had been.

  • Tanya January 26, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    I am a little confused. Your article states what not to donate. I would like to know what to donate. I belong to an organization that has started collection of the following toiletries for 50-100 boxes for men and a 50-100 for women:
    For ALL boxes:
    Toothbrush
    Tooth
    Soap
    Shampoo & Conditioner
    Deodorant
    Lotion
    Hand Towel
    Hand Sanitizer
    Lip Balm
    Comb
    Brush
    For Men’s boxes:
    Underwear
    T-shirt
    For Women’s boxes:
    Maxi pads
    Underwear
    T-shirt/tank
    Hair bands
    We are sending the boxes through an organization that has local distribution in Haiti, so we do not think it will clog any ports. But is this in vain now?

  • Saundra January 26, 2010 at 2:25 pm

    Tanya,
    I hate to say it, but the chances of these goods making it through the port are pretty slim. The ports are already getting clogged with goods that the organizations have not been able to get out either because they lack vehicles and fuel, the items were sent without a person on the ground to retrieve them, the items have been buried under other items, or they weren’t properly marked. Also planes and boats are turned back often because the ports can only support so much traffic.
    For more on this see the post Coordination after Disasters

  • Jill Mielewski January 29, 2010 at 5:29 am

    what about used porta-cribs and baby clothes? I have an attic full of baby stuff.

  • Saundra January 29, 2010 at 7:22 am

    Jill,
    It’s best not to send over anything at this point. For stuff in the attic consider having a garage sale and donating the money or donate the goods to a local women’s shelter

  • [...] general, bad aid. I’ve written numerous posts on the problems with donated goods as well as a set of questions to help donors determine if they should send donated [...]

  • [...] provided some great examples and advice for drug donations in the comment section of the post 6 questions you should ask before sending donated goods overseas. She’s given me permission to include part of her comment [...]

  • [...] posts: The allure of the quick fix 6 questions you should ask before donating goods overseas Best practices often lose out to quick and cheap programs that please [...]

  • Twitted by goodgate August 13, 2010 at 10:00 am

    [...] This post was Twitted by goodgate [...]

  • Four eyes... August 18, 2010 at 8:03 am

    Hi Sandra, I was wondering on what your thoughts are on organisations that donate used eye glasses to developing countries (not necessarily in disaster situations, just generally). My local optometrist collects old glasses for such an organisation, and I have about 5 old pairs that I would donate rather than throw away if I thought that this donation would not be harmful in a way that gifts in kind so often are…

    • Saundra August 18, 2010 at 8:10 am

      Unfortunately, eye glasses fall into the same category of things you shouldn’t be sending. Reading glasses – because they don’t have the same need for an exact prescription – are easier to get the right match. But from what I’ve heard regular glasses are rarely the right prescription because generally each eyes is a different strength and if broken the lenses in foreign glasses can be impossible to replace. Better to support purchasing the glasses locally.

  • [...] a country. For some reason, this seems to happen a lot with shoes — see here, here, here, here, here, here, and here for more commentary. What should be sent and what [...]

  • [...] 6 questions to ask before donating goods overseas [...]

  • [...] shirts in the local market place. It’s actually not all that uncommon for organizations to pay more to import donated goods than it would have cost them to purchase the goods locally.Now let’s imagine that similar [...]

  • [...] are not enough has probably contributed the most to this discussion and I would strongly recommend reading her posts and checking her blog [...]

  • [...] 6 questions you should ask before donating goods overseas [...]

  • Justin March 16, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    Co, I shouldn’t send items over, i cant afford to go over myself to volunteer and can’t speak the language any way. So what to do? Donate money… I don’t want to pay someones salary or pay rent or have it misused or siphoned off by crooks at some local organization, I would want my money to go to the people that need it, or buy good for people that need it. So donating money is out. Should I just sit back and feel bad for the people and not do anything – what kind of world citizen would that make me?

    • Saundra March 16, 2011 at 2:34 pm

      Justin,

      It would make you a better world citizen than if you did any of those other things. If you send stuff, you clog ports and it likely won’t be needed. If you volunteer there’s a good chance you’ll not be helpful and could take away from the relief efforts. And believe me you, neither sending goods and volunteering yourself guarantee that help gets to the people that need it the most. Read this post: The problem with stop and droppers. http://goodintents.org/disaster/stop-and-droppers

      You have some incorrect assumptions about administration costs – they’re necessary for professional programs. And people in the wake of a disaster need professionals that know what they’re doing. http://goodintents.org/choosing-a-charity/dont-choose-a-charity-based-on-administration-costs

      Sorry if you don’t like your options, but that’s the reality of the situation.

  • Justin March 16, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    For all the reasons you mentioned in http://goodintents.org/choosing-a-charity/dont-choose-a-charity-based-on-administration-costs i wont donate money. All charities play games with the numbers and 1/2 are crooks to begin with – at least thats what I read after ever disaster is done and over, good meaning people getting bilked out of their hard earned money when trying to do good.

    See http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/charities.asp for an example of “administrative costs.” $400K+ for the red cross CEO, $900K+ for united way’s CEO. When the CEO makes as much, heck even double, what I make then I could see donating, but I refuse to pay their salaries.

    So in my situation, I just shouldn’t do anything – that just makes me feel like a bad person all around?

    • Saundra March 16, 2011 at 2:59 pm

      Justin,

      As far as CEO wages go. You’ll have to decide what you think. However, bear in mind that organizations that are multi-national with billion dollar budgets do need CEO’s that can lead that large of an organization. I’m not saying these wages are correct, but I am saying that if the wages are too small you might not attract candidates that are able to do the job well. And if they do it poorly it could waste a lot more money.

      What you do is your decision. How you feel is not up to me. All I can do is give you as clear and accurate information and advice as possible.

  • Justin March 16, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    Well, based on all the information I have there is no way for me to donate in a meaningful manner. I wish there was a place to give money and or good, that had the scale and capability to to things right, that didn’t, in my opinion, steal my money along the way.

    I agree in principle to higher CEO salaries means more qualified people, but after the whole bank failing, CEO crooks thing that killed the world economy… I just don’t trust em.

    • Saundra March 16, 2011 at 3:08 pm

      Ok, well there you go.

  • Sundoodle March 16, 2011 at 10:13 pm

    Dear Justin..others
    I don’t want give money to charties either..After reading you said about CEO..now I dislike them even more…I found this webcite..my Q is they say they need supplies..so no we aren’t sending to much…see very clearly they are requesting for certain things to be send to this direct address on this webcite in japan. NO IT IS NOT going to some blank port, getting lost..AS you can read says please send supplies to this address. It does say for local people, doesn’t say for us not send stuff. it just warns us it going cost money. MY question is how much..I don’t mind spending 20-40 dollars in sending box of stuff over to them, that much is shipping worth it.. if its in hundreds not worth it. I like idea myself of sending something to help…rather then sitting back watching people suffer without thinking there is no way to help.. IF u do consider this cite, go post office..please mail me back on how much they saying it would cost send package over to this address on this cite..

    • Saundra March 17, 2011 at 5:28 am

      Sundoodle,

      If you actually read the website, it’s only asking for food from people inside Japan. If you’re outside Japan they’re asking for a monetary donation instead. And I can tell you that people are having their packages returned to them with a note that they cannot be delivered because of the disaster.

1 2 3