Let’s just stone the whores
Posted on April 6, 2012 at 12:31 pm
We have decided that you should not be having sex and to stop this we will prevent you from getting birth control. We will remove birth control from insurance policies and shut down Planned Parenthood office across the country. If you have the audacity to question this, we’ll have filthy public discussions where we all hypothesize about your sex life.
If you do happen to get pregnant, we’ll prevent you from getting a legal abortion. We’ll shut down abortion clinics through over-regulation or force you to submit to a vaginal probe and description of the fetus. If that doesn’t work we’ll bomb the clinics and hunt down abortion providers. Your only choice will be risking your life with a backstreet abortion, giving your child away – but NOT to a gay couple, or raising the unwanted child yourself.
If you do decide to keep the child, we’re going to do our best to NOT provide you with any type of public assistance – you lazy welfare queen.
Why don’t we just simplify this whole process and stone the women to death instead. Isn’t that what Jesus would do?
Yes, I am very pissed off about all of this. It’s the opposite of good development – it’s anti-development. And it’s personal. They’re attacking me and millions of other women just like me.
—–
Guides by Good Intentions are Not Enough
Good Intentions’ Guide to Holiday Charitable Giving
—–
« The Anniversary of A Day Without Dignity • Announcing A Day Without Dignity 2012 – Local Champions »
Yes. This.
Hear, hear.
Good points but one clarification. Jesus, when offered the option, did not stone the woman in question. That was the “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her” passage. It is a passage I wish more people would remember when pushing this kind of legislation
Yes, actually that was what I was getting at with that sentence. Trying to show how un-Christe like their actions are.
The logical inconsistencies of SOME people are definitely infuriating…and you just lumped all pro-life people together into one anti- woman, anti- government intervention group …
Amen Saundra!!! This gets me fired up as well.
Well said. It is important to fight back. They just hate women. Do they even have a girlfriend? The demographic ranting of of David Brooks and the hate speak of social conservatives, both, seem to want to put women back to the kitchen.
Yeah. I keep watching this, slack-jawed with astonishment. Thanks for putting it so well.
I have decided I don’t care about you having sex at all, but I don’t want to pay for your choices. You are trying to force me to pay for this against my will. If I actually stand up and say this, you’ll claim that I am trying to oppress women everywhere, and am on the road to calling for stoning.
If the people that were so upset about paying for birth control were just as upset about paying for viagra and other erectile disfunction medications then I might have a different opinion. But as it is the people complaining the most loudly about paying for birth control are suspiciously silent on the issue of paying for viagra and other erectile disfunction medication that help men to have recreational sex (as very few men old enough to have erectile disfunction are still actually trying to procreate).
There’s very much a gender bias in this issue.
And what if I don’t want to pay for other lifestyle based medical costs. Should all the thin people in the world demand that their insurers not cover Type II diabetes related treatment – which is far more expensive than covering birth control. What about high-risk sports, should those of us that don’t participate in high-risk sports demand that insurance not cover injuries incurred in these activities? Should all the teetotalers in the U.S. band together to demand that their insurance not pay for alcohol related illnesses? Non-smokers could demand that no coverage be given for smoking related illnesses.
Why is it that sex the only life-style choice people have an issue with?
I also want to know why there doesn’t seem to be any outcry about vasectomies.
Good point, Catholic’s also do not pay for vasectomies or allow them to be performed in their medical clinics/hospitals. But nobody seems to be crying out that the Catholics are waging a war on men. Their policy against birth control applies to both men and women.
I will strongly support and even join you in calling for non-Viagra insurance options to be available. I may even support ensuring that no insurance may cover Viagra, but we’re not there. Let me know if you join any such movement.
As far as other chronic lifestyle expenses, I think that’s a perfectly valid point as well. Chronic problems are not really insurable. What those people need are lifetime subsidies.
For sports, perhaps you should look at current insurance options more closely — Many insurance companies require you to pay extra if you want to be covered while engaging in high-risk sports.
I would support any insurance company which carves out coverage for those people who live a lifestyle which they believe puts them at lower risk. I would consider some of those people very foolish, but don’t object to them thinking that way.
I do not have health insurance and have not had health insurance for most of my adult life. I’m one of the millions of American women whose only access to health care is Planned Parenthood.
Saundra, I have lived the majority of my adult life without health insurance and planned parenthood has been a savior. We all need to continue to fight this fight!